[NukeNet] India's Left Issues Blunt Threat Over Nuclear Deal

[Bill Smirnow]

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-india-nuclear.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
     India's Left Issues Blunt Threat Over Nuclear Deal
  a..                E-Mail
  b.. Print
  c.. Save



By REUTERS
Published: September 13, 2007
Filed at 5:42 a.m. ET

Skip to next paragraph
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Indian communists said on Thursday they would stop
supporting the government if it pursued a nuclear deal with the United
States, their most blunt threat in a month-old political crisis that has
shaken the coalition.

The comments by Prakash Karat, head of the largest of the four left parties
that shore up Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government, made it more
likely that Singh's government would not last its entire five-year term,
analysts said.

With Singh unlikely to back down over the nuclear deal, he may have to
choose between continuing in power as head of a minority government or
calling elections before his term ends in May 2009.

"We won't be there to help this government conclude this agreement," said
Prakash Karat, the chief of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M).
"That's final."

The communists, who have 60 MPs in the 545-member lower house of parliament,
had in the past warned the government of "serious consequences" if it went
ahead with the deal, without spelling out what those consequences could be.

The pact -- seen as a sign of booming economic and strategic ties between
the two powerful democracies -- allows India to import U.S. nuclear fuel and
reactors, despite having tested nuclear weapons and not signing the
Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The left says the deal undermines India's independent foreign policy and
draws New Delhi into a strategic alliance with Washington.

"ELECTIONS INEVITABLE"

In order to get the pact working on the ground, New Delhi needs to conclude
India-specific safeguards for its civilian reactors with the International
Atomic Energy Agency and also get the backing of the Nuclear Suppliers Group
of nations.

Besides, the U.S. Congress also needs to approve it again.

Karat said the government must not go ahead with talks with the IAEA if it
wants the communists to continue support.

"Don't go. Wait for some time. Listen to our objections. Examine these
objections. Let parliament opine on it," he told a seminar on the deal. "But
they have not so far agreed.

"This is not a normal matter of differences between us. The question is, why
this determination to go ahead despite the fact that the main parties on
which the government depends on for its majority say no."

The government and communists have set up a panel meant to resolve
differences over the deal, but Karat's comments show that finding common
ground will be extremely difficult.

"Each side is playing its cards in the expectation that the other would not
press the matter to the point of an immediate election," political analyst
Pran Chopra said.

But with the left intensifying pressure, the government was unlikely to last
its full term, he said.

"I think there will be elections after the budget," Chopra said. The annual
budget is presented to parliament on February 28.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: article-sponsor.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 437 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20070913/1a064b6a/attachment.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dej_button.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3633 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20070913/1a064b6a/attachment-0001.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reuters_sidebar.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 710 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20070913/1a064b6a/attachment-0002.gif